Wearables are dead

Jack

Administrator
Thread author
Verified
Staff Member
Well-known
Jan 24, 2011
9,378
Three years ago, smartwatches were supposed to be the next big thing.

They were going to be the platform where the next big app or social network was built. They were going to free us from our smartphones. They were going to go from a nerdy dream to a mainstream reality.

None of that happened.

In fact, it was the opposite. The market for wearables has proven to be insanely volatile, claiming victims much faster than we saw with the companies that went kaput following the introduction of the iPhone.

Last week, Pebble, the startup largely responsible for juicing interest in smartwatches back in 2012, sold itself to Fitbit for basically nothing. Its future products were canceled, and support for current products will end soon.



Then there's Android Wear, Google's operating system for smartwatches. Google had to delay the next version of Wear until 2017, and several partners have abandoned their plans to make new Android smartwatches this year. Motorola even said it halted its smartwatch plans indefinitely.

And there have been signs of struggle all across the industry from once-hot Jawbone to giants like Intel.

The smartwatch and other wearable gadgets have had more than enough time to prove themselves as major tech products, but the only companies seeing any kind of success are Apple and Fitbit. (Even then, Fitbit has had its own struggles since its entire business revolves around the shaky wearables market.)

It's time to admit that as enthusiastic as the tech industry was about wearables a few years ago, the gadgets we got either didn't live up to that promise or failed to dazzle enough people to become major hits. At best, they're niche products, great for fitness gurus or geeks who like getting emails on their wrist.

The signs have been there from the beginning too. While Pebble had an impressive Kickstarter debut, it never sold enough watches to seep into the mainstream, only crossing the 1 million mark after about two years. Apple failed to adequately explain why it made a smartwatch and what it was for, only to pivot this year and focus on the Apple Watch's fitness-tracking capabilities instead. Fitbit has been a roller coaster of minor successes and major disappointments.

Read more: Wearables are dead
 

Svoll

Level 13
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Nov 17, 2016
627
I never understood the appeal of the smart watch, if I holding my arm up to view things on a tiny screen, I might as well just grab my phone on a somewhat bigger screen. Only benefit I can see for myself would be its portability and during gym class.
 

jamescv7

Level 85
Verified
Honorary Member
Mar 15, 2011
13,070
Basically because people use the watch to check the time and date, nothing less and more.

It just adds unnecessary features where impact is not massive.

Actually the trend leads more on having separate gadget which contains sensors like gyro and accelerometer for fitness training or exercise or something else.
 

Paul123

Level 4
Verified
Well-known
Dec 9, 2016
174
A few years ago smartwatches would I think have caught on, but these days hardly anyone wears a watch, let alone a smart one. People seem to use their phones to tell the time etc. Its funny, in a way its like going back to the pocket watch.

I just can't see any real value, or use for a smartwatch. until they come up with something like that ring in 'Zardoz' (where it projects an image in the air, and you can talk to it) Its the same with digital assistants. for a while they are fun, talking to them, but ultimately pretty pointless in their present form.

Maybe smartwatches and digital assistants will catch on when they become better. Touch screens (laser based ones then) were tried in the 80-90s but never caught on, but now touch is a very common interface on phones and tablets as the technology got better, and also there came along devices where it was useful (phone, tablet). i dont think touch screens will catch on with laptops though, its just too imprecise and a mouse is better. it also means you have 3 (mouse/touchpad, keyboard, touchscreen) rather than two inputs to handle (mouse/touchpad, keyboard) and I dont think that is intuitive. You could for example, try to use touch to move to a letter in a word in a document to edit it, but your fingers are too big to be precise, but with a mouse its easy.
 
Last edited:

Exterminator

Level 85
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Oct 23, 2012
12,527
I would never buy one because I do not need it.
Never understood the appeal other than it being a novelty.
Of course something like the Fitbit serves a purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paul123

Paul123

Level 4
Verified
Well-known
Dec 9, 2016
174
I would never buy one because I do not need it.
Never understood the appeal other than it being a novelty.
Of course something like the Fitbit serves a purpose.
I guess that's where they would be/are useful, for fitness and health monitoring.
 

johnjacobs

Level 1
Verified
Jun 3, 2016
23
I agree with you. Smartwatch was about to be a big revolution in modern technology. But it can't grab that much attention.
 

Fritz

Level 11
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Sep 28, 2015
543
It's a funny thing with inventions sometimes. Had they managed to cough up those things in the late 80s, I'm sure everybody and their mom would have bought one. Yet, they waited until everybody gave up on wearing watches entirely. Yeah, maybe it wasn't possible back then, but I doubt the market cares.

I got myself an Apple Watch, but that's because I want to be able to receive quick messages from the office while I'm on the go. It's much easier to just glance at the watch face when driving or sitting with a customer than reaching into some pocket and pull out some 5ft phablet. That's my niche and that's it. Come to think of it, I only wear the darn thing during those occasions. Sometimes I don't wear it for days if I don't work outside the office.

Reading E-Mails, Social Media, News? Not on that tiny screen, there's a perfect smartphone right in my pocket. Maybe if I did cardio, but then I know when I'm out of breath or that I ran 5 miles on a 5-mile-run without a smart watch conveying the fact.

So yeah, while I wouldn't consider them "dead" per se, they're just one more accessory like a powerbank or an adaptor. Nothing to get all hyped up about.
 

Paul123

Level 4
Verified
Well-known
Dec 9, 2016
174
There was an interesting program on NHK (Japan channel) a few days ago in which they were intertwining wearables within clothes themselves. They had created a twine which incorporated circuits and could be washed and could stretch without breaking. They seem to be suggesting that wearables could use other things than visual cues though, touch/texture, heat, sound etc, and that might be the way to go, rather than tiny screens. Also clothes that change colour or even texture based on mood.

They also had smart tattoos too, that you stuck on which were devices.
 
Last edited:

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top