Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Webroot SecureAnywhere 2024
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Practical Response" data-source="post: 1078385" data-attributes="member: 109138"><p>I would have to agree to disagree, as the rollback and journaling are part of the applications design, not a theory, a theory would be should the user have had opened system utilities during the test and found the active process of the worm and blocked it, could he have had possibly continued the test. If the test were allowed to continue for some time, would the application itself respond as it was designed too? Without doing either how can anyone speculate the product failed? If it's allowed to be used as intended and fails it is one thing, but quite another to judge the product from half way attempts at testing it. "no offense meant towards testers or those commenting here". </p><p></p><p>The manual controls were placed to be used as well as the utilities, the ability to reset functions and enter safe mode as needed. I have tested webroot myself back in the day when it was a bit more popular and found that it needed to be tested differently than the rest because of design, did it fail tests, certainly, but I gave it a fair shake by its design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Practical Response, post: 1078385, member: 109138"] I would have to agree to disagree, as the rollback and journaling are part of the applications design, not a theory, a theory would be should the user have had opened system utilities during the test and found the active process of the worm and blocked it, could he have had possibly continued the test. If the test were allowed to continue for some time, would the application itself respond as it was designed too? Without doing either how can anyone speculate the product failed? If it's allowed to be used as intended and fails it is one thing, but quite another to judge the product from half way attempts at testing it. "no offense meant towards testers or those commenting here". The manual controls were placed to be used as well as the utilities, the ability to reset functions and enter safe mode as needed. I have tested webroot myself back in the day when it was a bit more popular and found that it needed to be tested differently than the rest because of design, did it fail tests, certainly, but I gave it a fair shake by its design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top