Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 109138" data-source="post: 1078410">As per my first initial post, it was to establish that the product even in default settings was not being tested as designed. It was the main point I was trying to establish. Its &quot;features&quot; work differently than other products and needs &quot;time&quot; dependent upon samples and variables to function as it was designed. The journal and rollback feature has to &quot;monitor&quot; the sample to come to conclusions before it reacts to them. It does this in a contained state restricting access to system files ect. As seen in other videos, this product can not be just slammed with samples then call it a night, its not designed as such. To be clear, I&#039;m not a fan of webroot, I do not even use the product, and have not tested it myself in some years. I am however a fan of testing applications as they are meant to be used and designed. Its only proper and fair to do so for the product, company and potential users.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 109138, post: 1078410"] As per my first initial post, it was to establish that the product even in default settings was not being tested as designed. It was the main point I was trying to establish. Its "features" work differently than other products and needs "time" dependent upon samples and variables to function as it was designed. The journal and rollback feature has to "monitor" the sample to come to conclusions before it reacts to them. It does this in a contained state restricting access to system files ect. As seen in other videos, this product can not be just slammed with samples then call it a night, its not designed as such. To be clear, I'm not a fan of webroot, I do not even use the product, and have not tested it myself in some years. I am however a fan of testing applications as they are meant to be used and designed. Its only proper and fair to do so for the product, company and potential users. [/QUOTE]

Verification