Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 824875" data-attributes="member: 32260">Prove it.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite135" alt=":giggle:" title="Giggle&nbsp; &nbsp; :giggle:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":giggle:" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />That is true, but how from this it follows that HIPS, Sandboxing, or dynamic heuristics are &#039;Behavior Blockers&#039;?So far, I found some faithful references (included in the first post) which clearly differentiate between &#039;Behavior Blocker&#039;&nbsp; (Behavior Control) and Sandboxing or Advanced Heuristics. Please show references which say otherwise.Edit.Please do not treat my post as a personal challenge. My actual opinion is based on some references (+ personal experience with computers from 35 years), and maybe there are some other references which say otherwise. From the fact that I could not find any, it does not follow that they do not exist. It would be interesting to compare them with those that I found. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />Edit2.The language argument should not be used in the thread on AV protection.By the way, it is not valid. For example, from the fact that one can think, it does not follow that she/he must be a thinker or similarly from the fact that one can drink it does not follow that she/he is a drinker.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 824875, member: 32260"] Prove it.:giggle:(y) That is true, but how from this it follows that HIPS, Sandboxing, or dynamic heuristics are 'Behavior Blockers'? So far, I found some faithful references (included in the first post) which clearly differentiate between 'Behavior Blocker' (Behavior Control) and Sandboxing or Advanced Heuristics. Please show references which say otherwise. Edit. Please do not treat my post as a personal challenge. My actual opinion is based on some references (+ personal experience with computers from 35 years), and maybe there are some other references which say otherwise. From the fact that I could not find any, it does not follow that they do not exist. It would be interesting to compare them with those that I found. (y) Edit2. The language argument should not be used in the thread on AV protection. By the way, it is not valid. For example, from the fact that one can think, it does not follow that she/he must be a thinker or similarly from the fact that one can drink it does not follow that she/he is a drinker.:emoji_thinking: [/QUOTE]

Verification