Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
What Company is Best Positioned to Deliver the Next Breakthrough Security Application
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 769007" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>You know, I almost always agree with you [USER=49173]@davisd[/USER] (when I understand what you are saying lol and jk I promise). With all respect, on this one, I disagree. For me, security is not a suite of protections that give you a reasonable chance to block malware. I don't even pay attention to those programs...even though they are good protection in some cases. No, in my opinion, real security is an architecture and a perfect science. It melds with the system and harmonizes. That said, if I am not satisfied now with products, well, I can imagine how the developers must feel whose pride is attached to the programs. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite112" alt=":mad:" title="Mad :mad:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":mad:" /></p><p></p><p>Not to say that I feel developers should have already developed the architecture of security at this point. I wouldn't say so. This is because the OS is changing and even the languages. Writing must be like trying to clean up the house so that it looks perfect while the workers are renovating and are tearing everything out. All this said, I expect one of them to break out from the pack...not against ransomware or fileless malware or for Microsoft :emoji_flushed: or against Microsoft...just will deliver a really clever and efficient way to achieve better than present concepts->like I am feeling it for WAY better than now from the efficiency and effectiveness angle.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand (about breakthroughs), I probably could have asked which company will raise the bar next (rather than breakthrough). I think Kaspersky has set the current bar, but I know the talk of a breakthrough upsets people sometimes. I don't think of it the same way I guess. A breakthrough for me is more of a bigger step in a progression of mostly smaller ones...exciting development maybe but not necessarily "everything there will be".</p><p></p><p>One last thing. Do a mantra like this "10 years from now", "10 years from now", etc. and meditate that way considering what the security landscape (and applications) will be like at that time. I'm kind of joking here, but really I think we will see unexpected efficiency by today's standards and economy of resources too. I do think we'll see almost all the companies we see now will still be around too in 10 years.</p><p></p><p>When there are breakthroughs...they tend to come fast on each other's heels, and I think there will be some of those along the way, although not necessarily a product...maybe sometimes a legal decision or other issue loosely related to computing and security.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 769007, member: 32547"] You know, I almost always agree with you [USER=49173]@davisd[/USER] (when I understand what you are saying lol and jk I promise). With all respect, on this one, I disagree. For me, security is not a suite of protections that give you a reasonable chance to block malware. I don't even pay attention to those programs...even though they are good protection in some cases. No, in my opinion, real security is an architecture and a perfect science. It melds with the system and harmonizes. That said, if I am not satisfied now with products, well, I can imagine how the developers must feel whose pride is attached to the programs. :mad: Not to say that I feel developers should have already developed the architecture of security at this point. I wouldn't say so. This is because the OS is changing and even the languages. Writing must be like trying to clean up the house so that it looks perfect while the workers are renovating and are tearing everything out. All this said, I expect one of them to break out from the pack...not against ransomware or fileless malware or for Microsoft :emoji_flushed: or against Microsoft...just will deliver a really clever and efficient way to achieve better than present concepts->like I am feeling it for WAY better than now from the efficiency and effectiveness angle. On the other hand (about breakthroughs), I probably could have asked which company will raise the bar next (rather than breakthrough). I think Kaspersky has set the current bar, but I know the talk of a breakthrough upsets people sometimes. I don't think of it the same way I guess. A breakthrough for me is more of a bigger step in a progression of mostly smaller ones...exciting development maybe but not necessarily "everything there will be". One last thing. Do a mantra like this "10 years from now", "10 years from now", etc. and meditate that way considering what the security landscape (and applications) will be like at that time. I'm kind of joking here, but really I think we will see unexpected efficiency by today's standards and economy of resources too. I do think we'll see almost all the companies we see now will still be around too in 10 years. When there are breakthroughs...they tend to come fast on each other's heels, and I think there will be some of those along the way, although not necessarily a product...maybe sometimes a legal decision or other issue loosely related to computing and security. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top