Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="509322" data-source="post: 769225">This person knows what they&#039;re talking about.The comment about home users wanting a soft to do it for them is spot on. (Unfortunately, a lot of enterprise admins are naive and want and expect the same thing. The whole enterprise security space is really messed-up.)The comment about Enterprises sick and tired of Microsoft&#039;s non-existent documentation is spot on.The comment about Enterprises not wanting to deal with Microsoft&#039;s enterprise-level security is spot on. Why ? Because the costs, the lack of documentation and the consequential administrative overhead of Windows is massive.Some would argue &quot;Well, it&#039;s an admin&#039;s job to deal with this stuff.&quot; Increasingly, admins just don&#039;t want to hear it. There has been discontent with&nbsp; Microsoft and its Windows garbage for decades. If you get into their server products, it is an even more obnoxious, oppressive mess.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="509322, post: 769225"] This person knows what they're talking about. The comment about home users wanting a soft to do it for them is spot on. (Unfortunately, a lot of enterprise admins are naive and want and expect the same thing. The whole enterprise security space is really messed-up.) The comment about Enterprises sick and tired of Microsoft's non-existent documentation is spot on. The comment about Enterprises not wanting to deal with Microsoft's enterprise-level security is spot on. Why ? Because the costs, the lack of documentation and the consequential administrative overhead of Windows is massive. Some would argue "Well, it's an admin's job to deal with this stuff." Increasingly, admins just don't want to hear it. There has been discontent with Microsoft and its Windows garbage for decades. If you get into their server products, it is an even more obnoxious, oppressive mess. [/QUOTE]

Verification