Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1055445">[USER=1765]@Morro[/USER]I surfed to three of the websites you reported and SafeToOpen did not throw a warning. I think they had tuned their visual engine which recognizes phishing attempts a bit to crudely (or they did not train it well).I can understand Cyberlock. On the website voodooshield it mentions Cyberlock while there is a website called cyberlock.com, maybe SafeToOpen thought&nbsp; voodooshield.com impersonated cyberlock <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Moodboard maker is also a term used a lot by different vendors, maybe SafeToOpen thought it was a rip off of another moodboard maker.NOS also could have shown an image which other news website also showed.I don&#039;t have a clue about the othersNice find <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /> these tuning errors show it indeed that SafeToOpen has a completely different approach to detecting phishing websites</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1055445"] [USER=1765]@Morro[/USER] I surfed to three of the websites you reported and SafeToOpen did not throw a warning. I think they had tuned their visual engine which recognizes phishing attempts a bit to crudely (or they did not train it well). I can understand Cyberlock. On the website voodooshield it mentions Cyberlock while there is a website called cyberlock.com, maybe SafeToOpen thought voodooshield.com impersonated cyberlock :) Moodboard maker is also a term used a lot by different vendors, maybe SafeToOpen thought it was a rip off of another moodboard maker. NOS also could have shown an image which other news website also showed. I don't have a clue about the others Nice find (y) these tuning errors show it indeed that SafeToOpen has a completely different approach to detecting phishing websites [/QUOTE]

Verification