Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
What is your opinion about Microsoft Windows Defender (Windows 10)?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 869948" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>I would agree with your post under some conditions.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The "AV Test, VB Bulletin, AV Comparatives and whatever other AV lab tests" can give the similarly approximate results for all AVs.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The novel sophisticated threads are dangerous for all AVs and there are no accepted tests on this topic. WD (free) cannot stop most of such threats by design - it would require the WD ATP + AppLocker + Application Control, etc. Some of the advanced features included in WD ATP can be activated by PowerShell (or ConfigureDefender). Anyway, these threats are not statistically important for home users.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Anyone who is really paranoid about security will not use any of the free AVs alone.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">WD is the most friendly AV for average users on Windows 8+, because they do not need to install it and tweak it. Furthermore, WD is most compatible with Windows and installed software.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Most MT readers do not need H_C, but probably need some of its features, like restricting/blocking scripts, shortcuts, and Windows remote features. All of this can be covered by caution, safe habits, and some knowledge (without using H_C and similar hardening applications). The H_C was created (in the first place) for average users who can get occasional help from an advanced user (family administrator).</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 869948, member: 32260"] I would agree with your post under some conditions. [LIST=1] [*]The "AV Test, VB Bulletin, AV Comparatives and whatever other AV lab tests" can give the similarly approximate results for all AVs. [*]The novel sophisticated threads are dangerous for all AVs and there are no accepted tests on this topic. WD (free) cannot stop most of such threats by design - it would require the WD ATP + AppLocker + Application Control, etc. Some of the advanced features included in WD ATP can be activated by PowerShell (or ConfigureDefender). Anyway, these threats are not statistically important for home users. [*]Anyone who is really paranoid about security will not use any of the free AVs alone. [*]WD is the most friendly AV for average users on Windows 8+, because they do not need to install it and tweak it. Furthermore, WD is most compatible with Windows and installed software. [*]Most MT readers do not need H_C, but probably need some of its features, like restricting/blocking scripts, shortcuts, and Windows remote features. All of this can be covered by caution, safe habits, and some knowledge (without using H_C and similar hardening applications). The H_C was created (in the first place) for average users who can get occasional help from an advanced user (family administrator). [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top