Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Which AV are you using and why did you choose this one ??
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Game Of Thrones" data-source="post: 1109178" data-attributes="member: 23430"><p>eset is module-based, every module talks to each other so if you disable the real-time you actually cut the info that it sends to other modules because it feeds other modules too. even the hips module talks to others. you can see the modules in the About section on eset products they get updated separately, this was the old era when people disabled the real-time and tested the behavior blocker of antimalware even back then it was wrong and the industry soon recognized how wrong it was. now nearly every antimalware is multilayer and module-based, and all of them are connected and talk to each other.</p><p></p><p>do you want to see advanced tests? see mitre attacks tests, these tests are much more advanced than that crap amateurish tests on youtube and sites. In the business world, no one cares about YouTube and other tests we choose the product based on our own tests and industry-recognized practices. for example, it took us nearly 3 months to select our solutions, from performance to detection all were tested. Even our developers created some malware so we can see how they react.</p><p></p><p>tests are wrong because of this :</p><p>they don't use zero-day samples, the samples that are used are mostly low-quality from publicly available websites.</p><p></p><p>in the real world the missed samples are not that important their quality is. a pup missed one or a little risky app is sometimes counted as miss in tests.</p><p></p><p>the detection of the samples that people are in contact with is more important. a missed sample can be seen just by 20 people who hunted for it! but a detected one is seen by 1000 normal people. the reaction time to important samples is much more critical than detecting a sample that just resides in a malware submission site! . Do you think a million-dollar company can not have some guys just to collect the samples that general people can access and make themselves the king of tests? where do you think the YouTube tests, review tests collect their samples from? do you think the company's malware hunters can not have access to them?! It's easy to have dedicated people just to make detection for publicly available samples and make people think they are the best.</p><p></p><p>a good company detects real-world malware, the malware you see in everyday surfing, the malware you are in contact with, they train and tune the product for real-world.</p><p></p><p>The Antimalware companies have dedicated people for hunting malware in the dark side of the web. they have their own crawlers on the internet, their own sensors, honeypots, telemetry data etc, things people who test on YouTube and websites do not have access to.</p><p></p><p>there is no product that can detect 100% but there are products that protect people near 100 in real-world. they detect the samples that a business or ordinary people get in contact with. a product may miss ransomware or get bypassed in MalwareTips tests! but in real-world protect its users.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Game Of Thrones, post: 1109178, member: 23430"] eset is module-based, every module talks to each other so if you disable the real-time you actually cut the info that it sends to other modules because it feeds other modules too. even the hips module talks to others. you can see the modules in the About section on eset products they get updated separately, this was the old era when people disabled the real-time and tested the behavior blocker of antimalware even back then it was wrong and the industry soon recognized how wrong it was. now nearly every antimalware is multilayer and module-based, and all of them are connected and talk to each other. do you want to see advanced tests? see mitre attacks tests, these tests are much more advanced than that crap amateurish tests on youtube and sites. In the business world, no one cares about YouTube and other tests we choose the product based on our own tests and industry-recognized practices. for example, it took us nearly 3 months to select our solutions, from performance to detection all were tested. Even our developers created some malware so we can see how they react. tests are wrong because of this : they don't use zero-day samples, the samples that are used are mostly low-quality from publicly available websites. in the real world the missed samples are not that important their quality is. a pup missed one or a little risky app is sometimes counted as miss in tests. the detection of the samples that people are in contact with is more important. a missed sample can be seen just by 20 people who hunted for it! but a detected one is seen by 1000 normal people. the reaction time to important samples is much more critical than detecting a sample that just resides in a malware submission site! . Do you think a million-dollar company can not have some guys just to collect the samples that general people can access and make themselves the king of tests? where do you think the YouTube tests, review tests collect their samples from? do you think the company's malware hunters can not have access to them?! It's easy to have dedicated people just to make detection for publicly available samples and make people think they are the best. a good company detects real-world malware, the malware you see in everyday surfing, the malware you are in contact with, they train and tune the product for real-world. The Antimalware companies have dedicated people for hunting malware in the dark side of the web. they have their own crawlers on the internet, their own sensors, honeypots, telemetry data etc, things people who test on YouTube and websites do not have access to. there is no product that can detect 100% but there are products that protect people near 100 in real-world. they detect the samples that a business or ordinary people get in contact with. a product may miss ransomware or get bypassed in MalwareTips tests! but in real-world protect its users. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
