Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pxxb1" data-source="post: 997591" data-attributes="member: 69270">There are others here besides us that can read our conversation and they can seeEvery time i ask you about your actions in this matter, you give an answer but at the same time omitt an answer, so i have to ask, again, just to get the full picture.This has been going on in several posts. When retesting U-T you say----------------------------------------The untold, the understaement here, in your conversation is, that it was all about the Monitoring factor of Soft Org. and U-T from the beginning. Just read the conversation from where it started, my first question and what it was based on, and you will see. Based on my now quoted post of yours it is clear that you have missed that, totally. Otherwise you would not have restested U-T the way you did (without the monitoring feature), which was a&nbsp; pointless action, or as you said, a waste of time.But i leave this now since i have gotten my answers due to my own actions. I finish with a friendly advice for the future, which you probably take as an insult, when stating, with firmness, that this and that is so and so according to your testing, it has to be a fresh test, otherwise you have to inform about the time for the event of testing. When it is 3-years old, that is not a good base for a firm statement. Not saying so is to omitt vital data.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pxxb1, post: 997591, member: 69270"] There are others here besides us that can read our conversation and they can see Every time i ask you about your actions in this matter, you give an answer but at the same time omitt an answer, so i have to ask, again, just to get the full picture.This has been going on in several posts. When retesting U-T you say ---------------------------------------- The untold, the understaement here, in your conversation is, that it was all about the Monitoring factor of Soft Org. and U-T from the beginning. Just read the conversation from where it started, my first question and what it was based on, and you will see. Based on my now quoted post of yours it is clear that you have missed that, totally. Otherwise you would not have restested U-T the way you did (without the monitoring feature), which was a pointless action, or as you said, a waste of time. But i leave this now since i have gotten my answers due to my own actions. I finish with a friendly advice for the future, which you probably take as an insult, when stating, with firmness, that this and that is so and so according to your testing, it has to be a fresh test, otherwise you have to inform about the time for the event of testing. When it is 3-years old, that is not a good base for a firm statement. Not saying so is to omitt vital data. [/QUOTE]

Verification