Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
Which Ubo filters do you use ?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1054078"><p>I guess AG put it in initially to offer their customers the old-trusted-known filters on top of their own filters. So yes, that would be a valid explanation.</p><p></p><p>Another guess is that they don't have people looking at third-party filters manually anymore. When they should have checked (like [USER=80838]@Jan Willy[/USER] did) they would have seen it is not maintained anymore. I think they have automated the maintenance and update. As [USER=73194]@South Park[/USER] posted a subset is maintained, so their (automated) update check confirms that it changes from time to time. Also in my <a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/which-ubo-filters-2023-do-you-use.122979/page-5#post-1053981" target="_blank">post#94</a> I added two links of Brave research. In one of them they also discovered that a substantial part of "old" (5 year old) rules keep blocking stuff. Which means that in their (automated) triggering check they see that some of those block rules still block stuff. As said all guestimates, but this could be the reason it stays in the list.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1054078"] I guess AG put it in initially to offer their customers the old-trusted-known filters on top of their own filters. So yes, that would be a valid explanation. Another guess is that they don't have people looking at third-party filters manually anymore. When they should have checked (like [USER=80838]@Jan Willy[/USER] did) they would have seen it is not maintained anymore. I think they have automated the maintenance and update. As [USER=73194]@South Park[/USER] posted a subset is maintained, so their (automated) update check confirms that it changes from time to time. Also in my [URL='https://malwaretips.com/threads/which-ubo-filters-2023-do-you-use.122979/page-5#post-1053981']post#94[/URL] I added two links of Brave research. In one of them they also discovered that a substantial part of "old" (5 year old) rules keep blocking stuff. Which means that in their (automated) triggering check they see that some of those block rules still block stuff. As said all guestimates, but this could be the reason it stays in the list. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top