Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 107474" data-source="post: 1077184">Two comments1. One of your static rules is not nessecary (obsolete)Well the above static rule sort of achieves the same as your dynamic rules (although the static has MS but lacks TV compared to your dynamic rules).I think [USER=80838]@Jan Willy[/USER] proposed these static rules as alternative for dynamic rules to AdGuard users because AG does not has dynamic rules.So considering you are using dynamic rules,&nbsp; I would remove the (above) static rule blocking third-party scripts and frames linking to top level domains you never visit.2. About simplifying your setupWhen you have streamlined your user rules setup (and removed the overlap), you probably won&#039;t be running into website breakage anymore. Have a look at the URL House of Abuse.CH or uBO&#039;s build in malware lists. With your set of user rules, you probably block 95 percent of them.See I am a security addict, I am not able to tell someone to throw away his extra set of security measures (Jan Willy probably ROFL when reading this). <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 107474, post: 1077184"] Two comments 1. One of your static rules is not nessecary (obsolete) Well the above static rule sort of achieves the same as your dynamic rules (although the static has MS but lacks TV compared to your dynamic rules). I think [USER=80838]@Jan Willy[/USER] proposed these static rules as alternative for dynamic rules to AdGuard users because AG does not has dynamic rules. So considering you are using dynamic rules, I would remove the (above) static rule blocking third-party scripts and frames linking to top level domains you never visit. 2. About simplifying your setup When you have streamlined your user rules setup (and removed the overlap), you probably won't be running into website breakage anymore. Have a look at the URL House of Abuse.CH or uBO's build in malware lists. With your set of user rules, you probably block 95 percent of them. See I am a security addict, I am not able to tell someone to throw away his extra set of security measures (Jan Willy probably ROFL when reading this). ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification