Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nightwalker" data-source="post: 828885" data-attributes="member: 23015">For now I cant share the enthusiasm that some members are showing, because for all it is worthy this isnt whitelist technology, it is more like a VirusTotal Scanner checker with an algorithm logic (If older than X years/months and If not detected by X engines = safe).Whitelist isnt that simply to employ or maintain, in the past even big vendors had to do some technological partnership to keep this technology useful (Kaspersky using Bit9 database/resources).Of course I could be wrong here, but I doubt that it is similar to real whitelist technology like that was developed by Bit9 (now CarbonBlack).Edit: Norton does what this software wants to do since 2009 and there are many others vendors that do the same or better.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://community.norton.com/de/node/4573[/URL]&nbsp; (Norton Quorum)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nightwalker, post: 828885, member: 23015"] For now I cant share the enthusiasm that some members are showing, because for all it is worthy this isnt whitelist technology, it is more like a VirusTotal Scanner checker with an algorithm logic (If older than X years/months and If not detected by X engines = safe). Whitelist isnt that simply to employ or maintain, in the past even big vendors had to do some technological partnership to keep this technology useful (Kaspersky using Bit9 database/resources). Of course I could be wrong here, but I doubt that it is similar to real whitelist technology like that was developed by Bit9 (now CarbonBlack). Edit: Norton does what this software wants to do since 2009 and there are many others vendors that do the same or better. [URL unfurl="true"]https://community.norton.com/de/node/4573[/URL][B] [/B](Norton Quorum) [/QUOTE]

Verification