Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 874880" data-attributes="member: 32260">This reasoning has a few flaws.<ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Microsoft takes care of organizations and enterprises in the first place (not average users).</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Windows security development is mostly related to the development of new features. Any new feature can decrease the security of all users.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Criminals can adjust their attacks to any security, so security improvements are necessary.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">The malware can decrease the safety of all users, and still, the &quot;average users&quot; can be relatively safer due to smaller attack surface area.</li>
</ol>Of course, from the above, it does not follow that average users are surely safer.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 874880, member: 32260"] This reasoning has a few flaws. [LIST=1] [*]Microsoft takes care of organizations and enterprises in the first place (not average users). [*]Windows security development is mostly related to the development of new features. Any new feature can decrease the security of all users. [*]Criminals can adjust their attacks to any security, so security improvements are necessary. [*]The malware can decrease the safety of all users, and still, the "average users" can be [B]relatively safer due to smaller attack surface area[/B]. [/LIST] Of course, from the above, it does not follow that average users are surely safer.:) [/QUOTE]

Verification