Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Why are we even messing with anything other than WD these days?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 821638" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>Yes, the article is generally misleading, but not in the context of comparing Client ML with Cloud ML.</p><p></p><p>You are wrong. But it is probably not your fault, but Microsoft's. MS uses Windows Defender ATP in two different meanings.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">As Windows built-in features.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">As the software that can be installed on Windows Pro, E3, E5, etc. (but not on Windows Home) to manage 1.</li> </ol><p>Furthermore, the MS articles are usually related to the Enterprise editions and MS software (paid & not cheap) used in Enterprises.</p><p>In fact, Microsoft does not use the terminology 'Behaviour Blocker' but rather behavior monitoring.</p><p></p><p>Please read carefully the comparison table published by MS, and mentioned several times on MT forum:</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2O8jv[/URL]</p><p>especially the entry 'Runtime behavior monitoring' in the second table (Next Generation Protection).<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 821638, member: 32260"] Yes, the article is generally misleading, but not in the context of comparing Client ML with Cloud ML. You are wrong. But it is probably not your fault, but Microsoft's. MS uses Windows Defender ATP in two different meanings. [LIST=1] [*]As Windows built-in features. [*]As the software that can be installed on Windows Pro, E3, E5, etc. (but not on Windows Home) to manage 1. [/LIST] Furthermore, the MS articles are usually related to the Enterprise editions and MS software (paid & not cheap) used in Enterprises. In fact, Microsoft does not use the terminology 'Behaviour Blocker' but rather behavior monitoring. Please read carefully the comparison table published by MS, and mentioned several times on MT forum: [URL unfurl="true"]https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2O8jv[/URL] especially the entry 'Runtime behavior monitoring' in the second table (Next Generation Protection).(y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top