Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Why are we even messing with anything other than WD these days?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 888023" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>If you want to discuss BAFS, it is probably important to discuss the average dwell time of 800 days (43 to 895 days).</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.techrepublic.com/article/cybersecurity-malware-lingers-in-smbs-for-an-average-of-800-days-before-discovery/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>BAFS is probably useless when the malware that has been approved by SS and is already on hundreds or thousands of endpoints. Which is exactly my initial point... WD is great but it relies HEAVILY on SmartScreen which is far from perfect and quite easy to bypass.</p><p></p><p>I really wish people would stop claiming that certain malware only targets the enterprise and somehow completely eludes SMB and home endpoints without showing some evidence that this is the case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 888023, member: 62850"] If you want to discuss BAFS, it is probably important to discuss the average dwell time of 800 days (43 to 895 days). [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.techrepublic.com/article/cybersecurity-malware-lingers-in-smbs-for-an-average-of-800-days-before-discovery/[/URL] BAFS is probably useless when the malware that has been approved by SS and is already on hundreds or thousands of endpoints. Which is exactly my initial point... WD is great but it relies HEAVILY on SmartScreen which is far from perfect and quite easy to bypass. I really wish people would stop claiming that certain malware only targets the enterprise and somehow completely eludes SMB and home endpoints without showing some evidence that this is the case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top