Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RoboMan" data-source="post: 808501" data-attributes="member: 53544">Whoever knows me or reads my posts here knows I have no fanatism for certain software, and I&#039;m more likely to constantly change my security according to the tests I do from now to then. I&#039;ve used and loved great suites like Kaspersky and ESET, and I used to hate WD, because when I tried it back then, it was as bugged as Comodo back in the day, it slowed my whole system down and it was unbearable.Nevertheless, after every major Windows Update, I always grab my secondary laptop, clean install the update and try Defender. Despite all minor changes, never big surprises. But 1903 changed that. Maybe with the light theme, maybe with great and significant changes to the antivirus. But the truth is: it works. I paired it with Configure_Defender and CFW. It works.It&#039;s light. It&#039;s effective. It&#039;s non-intrusive. It&#039;s secure.Sounds to me what I was looking for all this time.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RoboMan, post: 808501, member: 53544"] Whoever knows me or reads my posts here knows I have no fanatism for certain software, and I'm more likely to constantly change my security according to the tests I do from now to then. I've used and loved great suites like Kaspersky and ESET, and I used to hate WD, because when I tried it back then, it was as bugged as Comodo back in the day, it slowed my whole system down and it was unbearable. Nevertheless, after every major Windows Update, I always grab my secondary laptop, clean install the update and try Defender. Despite all minor changes, never big surprises. But 1903 changed that. Maybe with the light theme, maybe with great and significant changes to the antivirus. But the truth is: it works. I paired it with Configure_Defender and CFW. It works. It's light. It's effective. It's non-intrusive. [B]It's secure.[/B] Sounds to me what I was looking for all this time. [/QUOTE]

Verification