Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Why I think testing "labs" are useless
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 883320" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>I agree that UAC is not a security mechanism. I was simply illustrating which one is easier for the average user to handle and understand.</p><p></p><p>You have to admit, it is quite funny that the same people who compare and contrast home vs enterprise are the same people who harden their systems against enterprise attacks, ie. SMB, RDP, etc. Why does this logic not apply to system hardening? </p><p></p><p>We are probably way off topic, so maybe we could start another thread if you guys want to discuss this further.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 883320, member: 62850"] I agree that UAC is not a security mechanism. I was simply illustrating which one is easier for the average user to handle and understand. You have to admit, it is quite funny that the same people who compare and contrast home vs enterprise are the same people who harden their systems against enterprise attacks, ie. SMB, RDP, etc. Why does this logic not apply to system hardening? We are probably way off topic, so maybe we could start another thread if you guys want to discuss this further. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
