Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Operating Systems
Windows 10
Windows 10 version 2004 rollout imminent
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 888735"><p>I installed 2004 on one of my rigs to see what it's all about and so far so good on my end! Mind you I always do clean installs when a major release is out and as a result I have yet to have any issues with any major update. Either I have been lucky, or it just shows the MS in place upgrades just suck and too many things can go wrong. As I've said, I have done clean installs with every major version and I have never, ever run into any issues that have come up with each release. While I know it can be a lot of work for some to get everything setup/configured the way they like it, but I am of the opinion that it is the much better option and causes the least issues, at least in my experience. It's very evident the in place upgrades cause more issues than the clean installs. At least from what I can see.</p><p></p><p>While I am not making excuses for MS, I often wonder how much of it is really MS's fault, vs hardware/software vendors fault? I hear Lenovo is having issues, but from what I can see the other major PC OEMs aren't (I may be missing it if they are). If this is the case, what is Lenovo doing that the other OEMs seem to have gotten right? It's cases like this which makes me question who's really at fault here.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 888735"] I installed 2004 on one of my rigs to see what it's all about and so far so good on my end! Mind you I always do clean installs when a major release is out and as a result I have yet to have any issues with any major update. Either I have been lucky, or it just shows the MS in place upgrades just suck and too many things can go wrong. As I've said, I have done clean installs with every major version and I have never, ever run into any issues that have come up with each release. While I know it can be a lot of work for some to get everything setup/configured the way they like it, but I am of the opinion that it is the much better option and causes the least issues, at least in my experience. It's very evident the in place upgrades cause more issues than the clean installs. At least from what I can see. While I am not making excuses for MS, I often wonder how much of it is really MS's fault, vs hardware/software vendors fault? I hear Lenovo is having issues, but from what I can see the other major PC OEMs aren't (I may be missing it if they are). If this is the case, what is Lenovo doing that the other OEMs seem to have gotten right? It's cases like this which makes me question who's really at fault here.:unsure: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top