Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Windows Defender Antivirus awarded as "best antivirus"
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 830159"><p>Well to be fair hindsight is always 20/20. IMO I don't think its necessarily MS fault. I think a lot if what we see today really wasn't on the mind of anyone at the time. I mean if you go back to windows 95 days and tell the programmers about these issues, some may look at you like your a little crazy IMO. It really was the advent of the internet, scripting, etc.. that has lead to this IMO. Take those away and no one would have any issues other than a USB type malware.</p><p></p><p>Also, it really has to do with marketshare. Windows still remains the marketshare king when it comes to OSes, so naturally, it will always be a target. Personally I think Windows has become more secure because of it. It will always be an evolution and many times if you don't know its there, how can you fix it? Take a look at the whole spectre/meltdown fiasco. No one really thought that these issues were there, until they were discovered. Now that they have been discovered, you see these issues pop up all the time, as more people are poking around cpus much more now than before.</p><p></p><p>One could say that linux and macs are more secure and/or did things better (which they did), but if I had to guess, my gut tells me that if linux and mac is got the same attention that Windows does, there would be security issues left, right and center.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 830159"] Well to be fair hindsight is always 20/20. IMO I don't think its necessarily MS fault. I think a lot if what we see today really wasn't on the mind of anyone at the time. I mean if you go back to windows 95 days and tell the programmers about these issues, some may look at you like your a little crazy IMO. It really was the advent of the internet, scripting, etc.. that has lead to this IMO. Take those away and no one would have any issues other than a USB type malware. Also, it really has to do with marketshare. Windows still remains the marketshare king when it comes to OSes, so naturally, it will always be a target. Personally I think Windows has become more secure because of it. It will always be an evolution and many times if you don't know its there, how can you fix it? Take a look at the whole spectre/meltdown fiasco. No one really thought that these issues were there, until they were discovered. Now that they have been discovered, you see these issues pop up all the time, as more people are poking around cpus much more now than before. One could say that linux and macs are more secure and/or did things better (which they did), but if I had to guess, my gut tells me that if linux and mac is got the same attention that Windows does, there would be security issues left, right and center.;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top