Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
Windows Defender Application Guard Extension for Google Chrome and Firefox
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Windows_Security" data-source="post: 804684" data-attributes="member: 50782"><p>[USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER]</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the answers, this sort of answers my question on the practical value for personal use. Att the moment when home users want to go into dodging browsing they can switch to Edge using sand-boxing and virtualization.</p><p></p><p>The whitelist has value for corporate users, they could automatically switch to virtualization when using their PC to visit not-whitelisted corporate websites. But it is offering ' mustard after the meal' as we say in Dutch, meaning that most large companies already have policies in place to deal with risky PC usage. </p><p></p><p>At the moment, most large companies in the Netherlands have a clause in their labor agreement in which employees have to promise to use their company PC in a wise and respectful way in compliance with the norms and values of that large company. Many labor agreements of large companies contain the clause that you will be fired when you don't comply with these conditions.</p><p></p><p>So also for corporate use it has limited value in the Netherlands is my guess (maybe only critical infrastructure companies and governmental bodies).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Windows_Security, post: 804684, member: 50782"] [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] Thanks for the answers, this sort of answers my question on the practical value for personal use. Att the moment when home users want to go into dodging browsing they can switch to Edge using sand-boxing and virtualization. The whitelist has value for corporate users, they could automatically switch to virtualization when using their PC to visit not-whitelisted corporate websites. But it is offering ' mustard after the meal' as we say in Dutch, meaning that most large companies already have policies in place to deal with risky PC usage. At the moment, most large companies in the Netherlands have a clause in their labor agreement in which employees have to promise to use their company PC in a wise and respectful way in compliance with the norms and values of that large company. Many labor agreements of large companies contain the clause that you will be fired when you don't comply with these conditions. So also for corporate use it has limited value in the Netherlands is my guess (maybe only critical infrastructure companies and governmental bodies). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top