Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 938678" data-attributes="member: 62850">Windows Security has come a very long way and it is a great product, but there is no need to be condescending, especially to members who bring up interesting and valid points.The issue might be that when proponents of Windows Security only discuss the positive attributes and completely ignore the negative attributes and limitations of solely relying on built-in Windows Security (including SRP), it not only makes the proponents look like fanboys, it puts real users at risk because they are unaware of the deficiencies and limitations.&nbsp; This is especially true when the only response to valid Windows Security bypasses is always &quot;Don&#039;t worry, home users are not targeted in this attack, this is an enterprise attack&quot;.&nbsp; People bash other security products all of the time, why is it not okay to discuss the deficiencies and limitations of all products, so that everyone can be adequately protected?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="danb, post: 938678, member: 62850"] Windows Security has come a very long way and it is a great product, but there is no need to be condescending, especially to members who bring up interesting and valid points. The issue might be that when proponents of Windows Security only discuss the positive attributes and completely ignore the negative attributes and limitations of solely relying on built-in Windows Security (including SRP), it not only makes the proponents look like fanboys, it puts real users at risk because they are unaware of the deficiencies and limitations. This is especially true when the only response to valid Windows Security bypasses is always "Don't worry, home users are not targeted in this attack, this is an enterprise attack". People bash other security products all of the time, why is it not okay to discuss the deficiencies and limitations of all products, so that everyone can be adequately protected? [/QUOTE]

Verification