Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Windows Defender disabled by malware
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Local Host" data-source="post: 938711"><p>[USER=72227]@Raiden[/USER] I disagree, [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] has multiple times denied Windows Defender has weaknesses against script attacks (went as far as claiming WD competes against Kaspersky on this department), same way he claims there's no need for third parties AVs nowadays.</p><p></p><p>Using AV tests to prove a point is simply a weak argument (those tests are to be taken as a grain of salt, and not real world results), something that can be easily tested on your own environment, write a simple malicious script and WD won't flitch after analysing the code from AMSI (try the same with any other third-party AV, this was actually done recently on a topic I already shared here).</p><p></p><p>Despite WD having improved over the years, is still not a top tier product and will let a good chunk of malware pass through it, on the Enterprise with ATP is a different story, as long as it is being monitored by a professional.</p><p></p><p>As for UAC bypasses, Microsoft own APIs supply the doors, I use them often at work, so my scripts don't bother casual users with prompts while being able to run code with elevated privileges (making the processes entirely automatic).</p><p></p><p>[USER=62850]@danb[/USER] is true SRP has been deprecated, Microsoft wants people to use Application Control and AppLocker instead.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Local Host, post: 938711"] [USER=72227]@Raiden[/USER] I disagree, [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] has multiple times denied Windows Defender has weaknesses against script attacks (went as far as claiming WD competes against Kaspersky on this department), same way he claims there's no need for third parties AVs nowadays. Using AV tests to prove a point is simply a weak argument (those tests are to be taken as a grain of salt, and not real world results), something that can be easily tested on your own environment, write a simple malicious script and WD won't flitch after analysing the code from AMSI (try the same with any other third-party AV, this was actually done recently on a topic I already shared here). Despite WD having improved over the years, is still not a top tier product and will let a good chunk of malware pass through it, on the Enterprise with ATP is a different story, as long as it is being monitored by a professional. As for UAC bypasses, Microsoft own APIs supply the doors, I use them often at work, so my scripts don't bother casual users with prompts while being able to run code with elevated privileges (making the processes entirely automatic). [USER=62850]@danb[/USER] is true SRP has been deprecated, Microsoft wants people to use Application Control and AppLocker instead. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top