Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Windows Defender vs Ransomware 2024 (TPSC)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1077967" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>Although Leo's "video tests" are among the best AV reviews, <strong>I am afraid that they have nothing to do with real protection</strong>.</p><p>The "video test" results are usually much better compared to real attacks. The crucial detection problem follows from 0-hour malware, fileless methods, and loaders (droppers). Those factors are mostly ignored in Leo's "video tests". In a real attack, the ransomware is usually a payload delivered by another malware (like a loader). The loader usually does not execute ransomware in a standard way as a child process, but uses advanced/stealthy methods that are much harder to detect.</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://any.run/malware-trends/loader[/URL]</p><p></p><p>So, the real protection follows from detecting the malware types and execution methods mostly skipped in Leo's tests. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite113" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1077967, member: 32260"] Although Leo's "video tests" are among the best AV reviews, [B]I am afraid that they have nothing to do with real protection[/B]. The "video test" results are usually much better compared to real attacks. The crucial detection problem follows from 0-hour malware, fileless methods, and loaders (droppers). Those factors are mostly ignored in Leo's "video tests". In a real attack, the ransomware is usually a payload delivered by another malware (like a loader). The loader usually does not execute ransomware in a standard way as a child process, but uses advanced/stealthy methods that are much harder to detect. [URL unfurl="true"]https://any.run/malware-trends/loader[/URL] So, the real protection follows from detecting the malware types and execution methods mostly skipped in Leo's tests. :confused: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top