Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Windows Defender vs Ransomware 2024 (TPSC)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1078036" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>The "gang bang" approach can be a valid test method if the author mentions that the video is a special <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">stress-kind</span></strong> test. The results of such a test can hardly impact overall protection and it should be mentioned in the test.</p><p>Of course, the stress test with ransomware does not make any sense. It should be done on general malware samples or even better on "monster installer" samples (if such exists in considerable numbers).</p><p></p><p>The author (and other authors) did not do any of the above, so I think that considering the video as a protection test is unjustified. If someone would like to see the video as a valid AV protection test, then it could be considered a hoax. <span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>I prefer to see it as a good presentation</strong></span>. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1078036, member: 32260"] The "gang bang" approach can be a valid test method if the author mentions that the video is a special [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]stress-kind[/COLOR][/B] test. The results of such a test can hardly impact overall protection and it should be mentioned in the test. Of course, the stress test with ransomware does not make any sense. It should be done on general malware samples or even better on "monster installer" samples (if such exists in considerable numbers). The author (and other authors) did not do any of the above, so I think that considering the video as a protection test is unjustified. If someone would like to see the video as a valid AV protection test, then it could be considered a hoax. [COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]I prefer to see it as a good presentation[/B][/COLOR]. (y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top