Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RansomwareRemediation" data-source="post: 1117301" data-attributes="member: 88078">I don&#039;t see errors in the test. YouTuber tests are the ones that most closely resemble reality, not like laboratories, where you never see the test, only numbers and percentages.Everyone who understands computing knows that Windows Defender is a mediocre antivirus. Otherwise third-party antiviruses would not exist and we would all use Defender.Defender is one of the easiest AVs to bypass, and it is totally useless if you disable cloud protection. I have seen it in many tests (even from AV Comparatives itself), the AV&#039;s offline protection is considerably mediocre, bordering on poor, if you deactivate its cloud. As they say, there is no worse blind person than someone who doesn&#039;t want to see.Greetings.pd: There is even malware that bypasses defense and gets into the antivirus exclusions.The way defender removes malware seems pretty bad to me, once it has penetrated the system.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RansomwareRemediation, post: 1117301, member: 88078"] I don't see errors in the test. YouTuber tests are the ones that most closely resemble reality, not like laboratories, where you never see the test, only numbers and percentages. Everyone who understands computing knows that Windows Defender is a mediocre antivirus. Otherwise third-party antiviruses would not exist and we would all use Defender. Defender is one of the easiest AVs to bypass, and it is totally useless if you disable cloud protection. I have seen it in many tests (even from AV Comparatives itself), the AV's offline protection is considerably mediocre, bordering on poor, if you deactivate its cloud. As they say, there is no worse blind person than someone who doesn't want to see. Greetings. pd: There is even malware that bypasses defense and gets into the antivirus exclusions. The way defender removes malware seems pretty bad to me, once it has penetrated the system. [/QUOTE]

Verification