Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Windows Defender vs Top 200 Ransomware (PC Security Channel)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1117305" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>It is possible that the term "test" means something else to me and you. So, I can see some obvious errors. For example, the test results should not depend on the order of executed samples. Also, the test with 200 samples, should not end after executing half of the available samples. I do not think that Leo intended to do a real test. He was simply curious if Microsoft Defender could protect against all gathered samples.</p><p></p><p>In the video, Leo demonstrated that after running (one by one) about 100 fresh ransomware samples Microsoft Defender's default protection was bypassed. He did not test other AVs on those samples, so we cannot relate the result to other AVs. It is impossible to conclude from this test if the result is good or not.</p><p></p><p>As a test, the video is pretty much useless. Most MT readers already know that any AV can be often bypassed after running 100 fresh malware samples.</p><p>As a demonstration, it can be useful for some users (it was useful for me):</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/windows-defender-vs-top-200-ransomware-pc-security-channel.134786/post-1117260[/URL]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Post edited/updated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1117305, member: 32260"] It is possible that the term "test" means something else to me and you. So, I can see some obvious errors. For example, the test results should not depend on the order of executed samples. Also, the test with 200 samples, should not end after executing half of the available samples. I do not think that Leo intended to do a real test. He was simply curious if Microsoft Defender could protect against all gathered samples. In the video, Leo demonstrated that after running (one by one) about 100 fresh ransomware samples Microsoft Defender's default protection was bypassed. He did not test other AVs on those samples, so we cannot relate the result to other AVs. It is impossible to conclude from this test if the result is good or not. As a test, the video is pretty much useless. Most MT readers already know that any AV can be often bypassed after running 100 fresh malware samples. As a demonstration, it can be useful for some users (it was useful for me): [URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/windows-defender-vs-top-200-ransomware-pc-security-channel.134786/post-1117260[/URL] Post edited/updated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top