Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 833033">Agreed!I have nothing against Leo personally, but I do take issue with how his tests/opinions are done.This test in particular is a good example. There are two possible scenarios in my mind.It&#039;s either:A. He really doesn&#039;t know how this feature works/is intended for, which is a problem in my opinion, as he is running a test and coming to a conclusion based on something he has no clue about. This is the reason why I&#039;m not a fan of YouTube tests in general. Just because you can run a malware pack and have some knowledge on computers doesn&#039;t mean you know everything. If you are going to do a test/review, better make sure you do your homework on each product before jumping in, as it can lead to misleading results/info.B. He does know how it works, but is running this test to just bash WD. This is also a problem, if not worse then A, as it just shows that he is indeed running tests and essentially rigging them one way or another. Which in&nbsp; turns makes all his test invalid, as they aren&#039;t being done with integrity and a non bias approach.I&#039;m leaning more towards it being A, but either one is still a problem IMO.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 833033"] Agreed! I have nothing against Leo personally, but I do take issue with how his tests/opinions are done. This test in particular is a good example. There are two possible scenarios in my mind. It's either: A. He really doesn't know how this feature works/is intended for, which is a problem in my opinion, as he is running a test and coming to a conclusion based on something he has no clue about. This is the reason why I'm not a fan of YouTube tests in general. Just because you can run a malware pack and have some knowledge on computers doesn't mean you know everything. If you are going to do a test/review, better make sure you do your homework on each product before jumping in, as it can lead to misleading results/info. B. He does know how it works, but is running this test to just bash WD. This is also a problem, if not worse then A, as it just shows that he is indeed running tests and essentially rigging them one way or another. Which in turns makes all his test invalid, as they aren't being done with integrity and a non bias approach. I'm leaning more towards it being A, but either one is still a problem IMO. [/QUOTE]

Verification