Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="n8chavez" data-source="post: 1118747" data-attributes="member: 90863">Well, I just block the directory used by my browser for downloads from executing.&nbsp; Actually, it&#039;s the direction Sandboxie plus saves downloads to.&nbsp; This way I have to make the conscious choice to move that file and execute it.&nbsp; The key is that it&#039;s my choice, not some downloader/driveby.I have used OSA in the past.&nbsp; It&#039;s very good too.&nbsp; But I found myself adding way more than needed exclusion rules, since each execution uses three rules.&nbsp; My exclusions.db contained like 200 rules since I like scripting and automation.&nbsp; OSA is too granular.&nbsp; I found VoodooShield (now Cyberlock) was a better fit for me.&nbsp; Plus [USER=62850]@danb[/USER] is a cool guy and he gave me a really great deal that ended up being a lot cheaper than OSA.Oh, good call!&nbsp; I&#039;ll have to look into those.&nbsp; I use Bitwarden Premium, and I doubt they&#039;ll be breached.&nbsp; Still, I&#039;ll look into yubikey,</blockquote>

[QUOTE="n8chavez, post: 1118747, member: 90863"] Well, I just block the directory used by my browser for downloads from executing. Actually, it's the direction Sandboxie plus saves downloads to. This way I have to make the conscious choice to move that file and execute it. The key is that it's my choice, not some downloader/driveby. I have used OSA in the past. It's very good too. But I found myself adding way more than needed exclusion rules, since each execution uses three rules. My exclusions.db contained like 200 rules since I like scripting and automation. OSA is too granular. I found VoodooShield (now Cyberlock) was a better fit for me. Plus [USER=62850]@danb[/USER] is a cool guy and he gave me a really great deal that ended up being a lot cheaper than OSA. Oh, good call! I'll have to look into those. I use Bitwarden Premium, and I doubt they'll be breached. Still, I'll look into yubikey, [/QUOTE]

Verification