Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Windows Sandbox vs Edge Application Guard Window (which is safer ?)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 822052" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>There is nothing to discuss on the advantage of Hyper-V container technology over Sandboxie. It is clear for anyone who read something about both solutions.</p><p>It is also clear that Hyper-V container allows running much more in the sandbox that it can be run in restricted Sandboxie sandbox.</p><p></p><p><strong>The rest is speculation which is hard to prove</strong>.</p><p>I think that bypassing Sandboxie would be in theory much easier than bypassing Hyper-V container. But this is not the same as the probability of bypassing if no one will try to bypass Sandboxie in the wild.</p><p>In my opinion, the properly restricted Sandboxie sandbox in the home environment will probably stop a similar amount of malware in the wild (including spying by exploiting the web browser) as the non-restricted Hyper_V container.</p><p>Of course, this is my personal opinion and if anyone thinks otherwise, I will not be angry.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite135" alt=":giggle:" title="Giggle :giggle:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":giggle:" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 822052, member: 32260"] There is nothing to discuss on the advantage of Hyper-V container technology over Sandboxie. It is clear for anyone who read something about both solutions. It is also clear that Hyper-V container allows running much more in the sandbox that it can be run in restricted Sandboxie sandbox. [B]The rest is speculation which is hard to prove[/B]. I think that bypassing Sandboxie would be in theory much easier than bypassing Hyper-V container. But this is not the same as the probability of bypassing if no one will try to bypass Sandboxie in the wild. In my opinion, the properly restricted Sandboxie sandbox in the home environment will probably stop a similar amount of malware in the wild (including spying by exploiting the web browser) as the non-restricted Hyper_V container. Of course, this is my personal opinion and if anyone thinks otherwise, I will not be angry.:giggle:(y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top