Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Windows Sandbox vs Edge Application Guard Window (which is safer ?)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 822060" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>As I said we start from the same facts but draw different conclusions. That is nothing wrong with it.</p><p>But I would like to point out some speculative thinking in your post:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>"Hyper-V doesn't stop malware."</strong></span><br /> You ignore the fact, that the user is vulnerable to spying. In restricted Sandboxie sandbox, the malware (If EXE file or Windows script) can be stopped.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>"Malware can infect the Hyper-V environment however it cannot escape unless the end user does something silly (e.g. allowing access to an organization network from within Hyper-V) or without a zero-day exploit (which is even less likely than pigs flying to Mars and back at this point)."</strong></span><br /> <span style="font-size: 15px">If no one will try to exploit Sandboxie, then the same can be said about Sandboxie.</span></li> </ol><p><span style="font-size: 15px">So, the question is: "Do such events can be sufficiently frequent to overcompensate the technology advantage of Hyper-V over Sandboxie?"</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">In my opinion, the answer may be positive. But, as I said before, it is a speculation based on my experience.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">It is pointless to discuss speculations, so let's agree to disagree on the practical advantage of Hyper-V over Sandboxie.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 822060, member: 32260"] As I said we start from the same facts but draw different conclusions. That is nothing wrong with it. But I would like to point out some speculative thinking in your post: [LIST=1] [*][COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]"Hyper-V doesn't stop malware."[/B][/COLOR] You ignore the fact, that the user is vulnerable to spying. In restricted Sandboxie sandbox, the malware (If EXE file or Windows script) can be stopped. [*][COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]"Malware can infect the Hyper-V environment however it cannot escape unless the end user does something silly (e.g. allowing access to an organization network from within Hyper-V) or without a zero-day exploit (which is even less likely than pigs flying to Mars and back at this point)."[/B][/COLOR] [SIZE=4]If no one will try to exploit Sandboxie, then the same can be said about Sandboxie.[/SIZE] [/LIST] [SIZE=4]So, the question is: "Do such events can be sufficiently frequent to overcompensate the technology advantage of Hyper-V over Sandboxie?" In my opinion, the answer may be positive. But, as I said before, it is a speculation based on my experience. It is pointless to discuss speculations, so let's agree to disagree on the practical advantage of Hyper-V over Sandboxie.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top