Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
General Apps
VPN and DNS
Windscribe & Censorship
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Burrito" data-source="post: 803517" data-attributes="member: 72439"><p>But are they?</p><p></p><p>Staying with the political theme..</p><p></p><p>Think of a county with 4 relevant political parties... so while the distribution could be mapped in two groups, it would be more accurate to depict it in four groups. But if you combined them to try to map it in just two dimensions, I'd guess it would not be a normal distribution. It might actually end up kind of lopsided. </p><p></p><p>Or...</p><p></p><p>Global Climate Change</p><p></p><p>In the US, the percentage of the population that believes in it is far greater than those who do not. Listening to the political debate in the US, one might believe there is what may be approaching an equal distribution. But it's not even close. Nearly half of Americans are pretty sure climate change is real. But only about 7% are pretty sure it's not real. The rest aren't sure. </p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">[URL unfurl="true"]https://e360.yale.edu/digest/americans-who-accept-climate-change-outnumber-those-who-dont-5-to-1[/URL]</span></p><p></p><p>So.... I think that thought distribution possibly often is not a 'normal distribution.'</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Burrito, post: 803517, member: 72439"] But are they? Staying with the political theme.. Think of a county with 4 relevant political parties... so while the distribution could be mapped in two groups, it would be more accurate to depict it in four groups. But if you combined them to try to map it in just two dimensions, I'd guess it would not be a normal distribution. It might actually end up kind of lopsided. Or... Global Climate Change In the US, the percentage of the population that believes in it is far greater than those who do not. Listening to the political debate in the US, one might believe there is what may be approaching an equal distribution. But it's not even close. Nearly half of Americans are pretty sure climate change is real. But only about 7% are pretty sure it's not real. The rest aren't sure. [SIZE=1][URL unfurl="true"]https://e360.yale.edu/digest/americans-who-accept-climate-change-outnumber-those-who-dont-5-to-1[/URL][/SIZE] So.... I think that thought distribution possibly often is not a 'normal distribution.' [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top