Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NormanF" data-source="post: 961514" data-attributes="member: 69126">I have it and it works well with SEP which seems to use a different FW.Its an antimalware and most of us prefer it be kept that way so our security options remain flexible. If it has to be registered as an AV with the Windows Security Center as a few users want, the option to run it alongside another AV, whether its Windows Defender or a third party AV, disappears.I have it running alongside KFA, SEP and OSA. That should lock down my PC for good.Its not an AV. Its an antimalware and taking it away would limit users&#039; security options. If people want an AV with HIPS, there&#039;s ESET. Why mess up a proven formula?I think a case could made for keeping automatic HIPS and FW settings free for average users. For power users who like to tweak settings,&nbsp; making customizable settings premium is the way to go for them. That way everyone benefits from protection depending on what level is right for them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NormanF, post: 961514, member: 69126"] I have it and it works well with SEP which seems to use a different FW. Its an antimalware and most of us prefer it be kept that way so our security options remain flexible. If it has to be registered as an AV with the Windows Security Center as a few users want, the option to run it alongside another AV, whether its Windows Defender or a third party AV, disappears. I have it running alongside KFA, SEP and OSA. That should lock down my PC for good. Its not an AV. Its an antimalware and taking it away would limit users' security options. If people want an AV with HIPS, there's ESET. Why mess up a proven formula? I think a case could made for keeping automatic HIPS and FW settings free for average users. For power users who like to tweak settings, making customizable settings premium is the way to go for them. That way everyone benefits from protection depending on what level is right for them. [/QUOTE]

Verification