Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Zemana AntiMalware proved to be the best ransomware protection among globally known products
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FleischmannTV" data-source="post: 525597" data-attributes="member: 23687"><p>Regarding these reports the most interesting (and perhaps revealing) part is always which products have not have been part of the test lineup, but should have, because it would have been interesting. I am not only missing WAR, but also major full-fledged products, like Kaspersky, Emsisoft and the likes. What if they would have stopped even more threats with less false positives? We'll never know. The report as it is, holds very little value, aside from a marketing standpoint from Zemana's point of view.</p><p></p><p>ZAM may, and I stress may, have an advantage over other companion apps, which comes at the price of false positives, but that alone doesn't tell people if it is necessary or beneficial, if they already have KIS or EAM etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FleischmannTV, post: 525597, member: 23687"] Regarding these reports the most interesting (and perhaps revealing) part is always which products have not have been part of the test lineup, but should have, because it would have been interesting. I am not only missing WAR, but also major full-fledged products, like Kaspersky, Emsisoft and the likes. What if they would have stopped even more threats with less false positives? We'll never know. The report as it is, holds very little value, aside from a marketing standpoint from Zemana's point of view. ZAM may, and I stress may, have an advantage over other companion apps, which comes at the price of false positives, but that alone doesn't tell people if it is necessary or beneficial, if they already have KIS or EAM etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top