Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1044800" data-attributes="member: 67091">I hope 30 degrees isn&#039;t... Fahrenheit <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite126" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL&nbsp; &nbsp; :ROFLMAO:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" />A beach is a beach, it doesn&#039;t matter if it&#039;s beautiful or ugly, enjoy the sun, the 30°C and the sea!Back from holidays, it&#039;ll amazing if you can make &quot;another&quot; video with a deep ZA test. I say &quot;another&quot;, because you already made a test. But I believe the new ZA versions are supposed to be better than the one you tested. It&#039;ll be nice to see under tests the new ZA version with App Control.Also will be great if you can keep your weekly (with few samples, no video).Totally agree. Shadowra said the malware was similar to a batch, so you&#039;re right, an user can write a batch, and the AV shouldn&#039;t block that.Despite that, IMHO, ZA should alert about changes in sensitive system areas (registry, drives, start up etc).In addition, I don&#039;t know why any malware will be interested on &quot;modifying registries to block exe files&quot;. I mean, one thing is to block an exe file, which is not necessarily a dangerous behavior. But to block exe files, and after that to run something else, or to connect to the internet etc... perhaps then the ZA behavioral blade should detect that potentially dangerous behavior.However, the whole discussion always is about the limits between the &quot;minimalist default ZA settings&quot; VS adding new features and more power customization at every new ZA version.It&#039;ll depend on ZA project!If they keep the current minimalist ZA, then it&#039;ll be enough for average Joes. But it won&#039;t be enough against big players.If ZA project expects to be among big security software players, yes or yes, ZA needs to make room for customization + new features in new versions.I&#039;m not an expert, but from my point of view, it&#039;s very hard to increase protection capabilities keeping current ZA minimalist UI.You&#039;re the Man!Excellent job.I honestly don&#039;t care about ZA marketing, branding etc.If ZA hears you, and they make changes, protection is improved, new features are added... it&#039;ll be be perfect for me!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1044800, member: 67091"] I hope 30 degrees isn't... Fahrenheit :ROFLMAO: A beach is a beach, it doesn't matter if it's beautiful or ugly, enjoy the sun, the 30°C and the sea! Back from holidays, it'll amazing if you can make "another" video with a deep ZA test. I say "another", because you already made a test. But I believe the new ZA versions are supposed to be better than the one you tested. It'll be nice to see under tests the new ZA version with App Control. Also will be great if you can keep your weekly (with few samples, no video). Totally agree. Shadowra said the malware was similar to a batch, so you're right, an user can write a batch, and the AV shouldn't block that. Despite that, IMHO, ZA should alert about changes in sensitive system areas (registry, drives, start up etc). In addition, I don't know why any malware will be interested on "modifying registries to block exe files". I mean, one thing is to block an exe file, which is not necessarily a dangerous behavior. But to block exe files, and after that to run something else, or to connect to the internet etc... perhaps then the ZA behavioral blade should detect that potentially dangerous behavior. However, the whole discussion always is about the limits between the "minimalist default ZA settings" VS adding new features and more power customization at every new ZA version. It'll depend on ZA project! If they keep the current minimalist ZA, then it'll be enough for average Joes. But it won't be enough against big players. If ZA project expects to be among big security software players, yes or yes, ZA needs to make room for customization + new features in new versions. I'm not an expert, but from my point of view, it's very hard to increase protection capabilities keeping current ZA minimalist UI. You're the Man! Excellent job. I honestly don't care about ZA marketing, branding etc. If ZA hears you, and they make changes, protection is improved, new features are added... it'll be be perfect for me! [/QUOTE]

Verification