AV-Comparatives Whole Product Dynamic Test – Results May 2011

About the Whole Product Dynamic Tests

In this test all features of the product contribute protection, not only one part (like signatures/ heuristic file scanning). So the ability of detection/protection should be higher than in testing only parts of the product. We would recommend that all parts of a product would provide high protection, not only single components (e.g. URL blocking protects only while browsing the web, but not against malware introduced by other means or already present on the system).

Monthly Results – May 2011

1. G-Data IS : 99,8% ; 0,2% Compromised.
2. F Secure IS : 99,7% ; 0,3% Compromised.
3. BitDefender IS : 99,5% ; 0,5% Compromised.
4. Norton IS : 99,5% + 0,2% User dependent ; 0,3% Compromised.
5. Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security: 99,3% ; 0,7% Compromised.
6. Panda IS : 99,0% ; 1% Compromised.
7. ESET IS : 98,9% ; 1,1% Compromised.
8. QIHOO 360 CN : 97,7% + 0,5% User dependent ; 1,8% Compromised.
9. Kaspersky IS : 97,6 + 0,5% User dependent ; 1,9% Compromised.
10. Avast IS : 96,9% + 1,6 % User dependent. ; 1.4 Compromised.
11. Avira Premium Security Suite : 96,9% ; 3,1% Compromised.
12. AVG IS : 95,3% + 0,5% User dependent. ; 4,2% Compromised.
13. SOPHOS Endpoint Protection : 94,7% ; 5,3% Compromised.
14. WEBROOT Internet Security : 94,1% ; 5,9% Compromised.
15. McAfee Internet Security : 93,9% ; 6,1% Compromised.
16. PC Tools Internet Security : 92,9% + 5,5% ; 1,6% Compromised.
17. K7 Total Security : 90,5% + 0,2 User depedent% ; 9,3% Compromised ;