Battle 250 sites test of my config vs safeweb and malwarebytes

[Vitali Ortzi]

results
malwarebytes + safeweb total score = 96.8% ( 8 links verified to be pishing )
(242 / 250) * 100 = 0.968 * 100 = 96.8%
16 links didn't get blocked but only 8 were phishing pages , fake stores


max config mix of (Symantec , Bitdefender, checkpoint , Microsoft ) have blocked everything 100% category based detection so zero phishing (a checkpoint tech ) didn't have any links left to scan and wasn't used


changes made malwarebytes had gTLD domains enabled , Symantec , checkpoint had added categories

test was made to showcase effectiveness of extensions mentioned in this topic Hot Take - extensions can help a lot against phishing

Spoiler: missed , dead links for verifying

https://cahse-ir6wf.ondigitalocean.app/login  dead
https://cahse-ir6wf.ondigitalocean.app/ dead
https://622895.com/r/895829.com   missed
http://www.nexusinvst.com/ dead
http://www.manuelfrancodonations.com/  missed (maybe not pishing  not counted )
http://www.fundspaymentsettlement.com/ dead
http://www.fdiuscorp.org/  dead
http://www.nmc-royal.com/  dead
https://containersnowpty.com/  missed
http://www.exoticpersandreptiles.com/  dead
https://famcokennel.co.za/  missed
https://afgglobalimportexport.co.za/  missed
https://apexcoreglobal.co.za/  missed
https://apexjoaoagrotradings.co.za/   missed
https://bctyres.com/  missed
https://factorytiredistributorsinc.com/  missed

used this http : //www . aa419.org/rss . php for the test (most missed links are from here )
as well as some links from https:// raw.githubusercontent . com/Phishing-Database/Phishing.Database/refs/heads/master/phishing-links-NEW-today.txt

 

[Bot]

Thanks for sharing your detailed test results. It's interesting to see that Malwarebytes and SafeWeb scored 96.8% in phishing detection, while Symantec, Bitdefender, Checkpoint, and Microsoft blocked all phishing attempts. This just goes to show the importance of using reliable security extensions to protect against phishing.

 

[Kongo]

Thanks for testing. Would love to see SafeToOpen included in the future.

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

Thanks for testing. Would love to see SafeToOpen included in the future.

just did a test with 20 links
one was dead and one was missed (fake shop )

from all the extensions above only trafficlight blocked that same link and symantec using added category (non defualt) suspicious

malwarybytes , checkpoint , norton ,safeweb, Microsoft , builtin google safe browsing all missed that link

VirusTotal

VirusTotal

www.virustotal.com

 

[Kongo]

just did a test with 20 links
one was dead and one was missed (fake shop )

from all the extensions above only trafficlight blocked that same link and symantec using added category (non defualt) suspicious

malwarybytes , checkpoint , norton ,safeweb, Microsoft , builtin google safe browsing all missed that link

VirusTotal

VirusTotal

www.virustotal.com

View attachment 286816View attachment 286817View attachment 286818View attachment 286819View attachment 286820

Thanks, appreciate it.

 

[Kongo]

just did a test with 20 links
one was dead and one was missed (fake shop )

from all the extensions above only trafficlight blocked that same link and symantec using added category (non defualt) suspicious

malwarybytes , checkpoint , norton ,safeweb, Microsoft , builtin google safe browsing all missed that link

VirusTotal

VirusTotal

www.virustotal.com

View attachment 286816View attachment 286817View attachment 286818View attachment 286819View attachment 286820

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

View attachment 286824

Nice that it's detected pretty fast anyway most extensions would have gotten worse results