Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
A Bitdefender Internet Security test
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cruelsister" data-source="post: 572783" data-attributes="member: 7463"><p>Ana- With BD I just had soooo many choices of malware that bypass it it was difficult to choose which one to demonstrate! </p><p></p><p>About upping the ATC- once again a really pretty term but that's about it. It was bypassed in all modes. Also as the Pro testers didn't employ it, I also could not for the purpore of this video.</p><p></p><p>FW- Good points, but I avoid doing the URL test as the URL blocking is essentially equivalent to having a definition for a true zero day sample- new malware, as well as new malware URL's will just blow right by such protection schemes. Also running some URL's that may have been sitting on some list or other for God knows how long is in my opinion a waste of my viewers time (which I fervently hope is precious). I also didn't include it as the song wasn't that long.</p><p></p><p>Regarding email protection you have a valid point. I've added a pre-existing botnet where ransomware was being emailed out by a D forked svchost in a couple of recently published videos and will include it in my season finale in a few weeks. </p><p></p><p>And finally running a file from the desktop (or Folder) is totally valid as this will take into account a malware vector from ANY source, including dragging it on to the system from a flash drive (didn't you watch Mr Robot?).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cruelsister, post: 572783, member: 7463"] Ana- With BD I just had soooo many choices of malware that bypass it it was difficult to choose which one to demonstrate! About upping the ATC- once again a really pretty term but that's about it. It was bypassed in all modes. Also as the Pro testers didn't employ it, I also could not for the purpore of this video. FW- Good points, but I avoid doing the URL test as the URL blocking is essentially equivalent to having a definition for a true zero day sample- new malware, as well as new malware URL's will just blow right by such protection schemes. Also running some URL's that may have been sitting on some list or other for God knows how long is in my opinion a waste of my viewers time (which I fervently hope is precious). I also didn't include it as the song wasn't that long. Regarding email protection you have a valid point. I've added a pre-existing botnet where ransomware was being emailed out by a D forked svchost in a couple of recently published videos and will include it in my season finale in a few weeks. And finally running a file from the desktop (or Folder) is totally valid as this will take into account a malware vector from ANY source, including dragging it on to the system from a flash drive (didn't you watch Mr Robot?). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top