Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
A Bitdefender Internet Security test
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jamescv7" data-source="post: 573769" data-attributes="member: 82"><p>Plot Twist:</p><p></p><p>One of the possible reason why some products managed to got 100% rating is because of very common infection vector? </p><p></p><p>A) Downloads a malicious file from URL (either in archived or not)</p><p>B) Executes the program</p><p>C) Detect by AV if signatures or behavior is available.</p><p></p><p>Most of the time it can detect within high percentage (that infection vector) however if you are developer of an AV product then consider different outlook.</p><p></p><p>You can have a balance protection on web shield, file shield and even behavior analysis; no matter how and where the malicious file came. </p><p></p><p>It's like you are putting CCTV cameras everywhere to ensure the monitor. not on the entrance or exit.</p><p></p><p>------------------------------</p><p></p><p>The problem nowadays where some companies take advantage on mentioning such colorful description when actually rely on signatures most of the time.</p><p></p><p>Yes it can detect but in mediocre performance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jamescv7, post: 573769, member: 82"] Plot Twist: One of the possible reason why some products managed to got 100% rating is because of very common infection vector? A) Downloads a malicious file from URL (either in archived or not) B) Executes the program C) Detect by AV if signatures or behavior is available. Most of the time it can detect within high percentage (that infection vector) however if you are developer of an AV product then consider different outlook. You can have a balance protection on web shield, file shield and even behavior analysis; no matter how and where the malicious file came. It's like you are putting CCTV cameras everywhere to ensure the monitor. not on the entrance or exit. ------------------------------ The problem nowadays where some companies take advantage on mentioning such colorful description when actually rely on signatures most of the time. Yes it can detect but in mediocre performance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top