A.I. News After Ubuntu, Now Fedora is Jumping Onto the AI Bandwagon With Dedicated AI Developer Desktops

lokamoka820

Level 45
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 1, 2024
3,423
3
11,497
4,369
Banana Republic
It is getting harder for Linux distributions to stay neutral on AI. Between enterprise-grade solutions like RHEL AI and the steady rise of local inference tools, the pressure to take a position has been building for a while.

Canonical recently made theirs clear, moving Ubuntu toward a local-first AI approach built around open-weight models and open source inference tooling, keeping everything on-device rather than routing it through a cloud subscription.

Now, Fedora has voted on an initiative called Fedora AI Developer Desktop that will spawn AI-flavored Fedora Atomic Desktops.
 
It will make it easier for newcomers, no Windows and no AI, less distros to choose from. I do not like 💩, so my choice is obvious, Ubuntu and Fedora scratched off. (y)
but well duh,,. you don't have to run fedora atomic with AI, I tried a fedora silverblue atomic a year+ ago and deleted it after a few weeks. I prefer regular fedora 44 / gnome, no AI in it (that I know of)
 
If you read carefully, both Ubuntu and Fedora is going to offer a choice. With Fedora, the main Workstation iso will only be ready for AI, not embedded with AI. Perhaps by Fedora 47, it will have developer tools ready. With Ubuntu, the AI will be a local engine with no online connection to ChatGPT, Gemini etc, and be delivered as a snap which you can uninstall. Ubuntu is going to offer a separate online AI iso.
 
Last edited:
If you read carefully, both Ubuntu and Fedora is going to offer a choice. With Fedora, the main Workstation iso will only be ready for AI, not embedded with AI. Perhaps by Fedora 47, it will have developer tools ready. With Ubuntu, the AI will be a local engine with no online connection to ChatGPT, Gemini etc, and be delivered as a snap which you can uninstall. Ubuntu is going to offer a separate online AI iso.
yeah I asked ChatGPT and it said about the same thing, fedora is not forcing AI on anyone into the foreseeable future (paraphrase). (is this sentence ironic / ironical... :rolleyes::ROFLMAO:
 
Windows AI integration (Copilot) was a highly unsuccessful attempt, just like Apple Intelligence (and I am still waiting for this super smart Siri announced nearly 2 years ago). AI belongs best in your browser. The more you push it outside, the more it… stinks.

I am not sure what use Fedora and Ubuntu AIs will offer but I’m sure many users will just try it and switch it off.
 
Fedora AI Desktop Initiative Blocked After Council Vote Reversal
The proposed Fedora AI Developer Desktop Initiative is now blocked after two Council members changed their votes from approval to opposition, despite an earlier unanimous vote in favor.

Fedora contributor Gordon Messmer submitted the initiative as a Community Initiative Proposal. Its goal is to strengthen Fedora as a platform for AI development by enhancing developer tools, community engagement, platforms, and packaging.

The plan initially cleared a key hurdle. At the May 6 Fedora Council meeting, the Council reviewed and voted to approve the proposal as a 12-month initiative. The recorded vote was +6/0/-0, with final approval expected after the lazy consensus period ended on May 8. However, that approval was later withdrawn.

It is important to understand that the core disagreement is not whether Fedora should support AI development, but how far Fedora should go in building a dedicated AI-focused platform. This is especially relevant if the work involves changes to kernel policy, NVIDIA enablement, out-of-tree drivers, CUDA components, and long-term maintenance.

At this time, Fedora’s AI Developer Desktop Initiative is not approved. It remains an open, blocked Council ticket, and the proposal is expected to be revised or clarified before further action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simmerskool
The Fedora AI Developer Desktop initiative was a complex proposal that, while not directly integrating AI in quite the same way Microsoft adds Copilot to all their software, would have challenged long-standing foundational tenets of Fedora.

This would not directly affect the standard Fedora Workstation per se, but it does create many reverberations and consequences that affect the community volunteering their time and making Fedora possible.

Some key points of contention:
  1. A proposed LTS kernel providing a more stable basis for AI workloads. Fedora is a semi-rolling distro, so the sudden appearance of a LTS kernel is a massive structural change at odds with the spirit of the project.
  2. Promotion of NVIDIA/CUDA support, leaning into closed-source and proprietary software. Fedora has always been a perfect embodiment and promoter of open, free software. They've never offered even optional non-free software in official package repositories. Open alternatives for GPU processing would include AMD ROCm and Intel oneAPI.
  3. The new integration of proprietary (i.e. out-of-tree) drivers and CUDA components would create legal and technical challenges that Fedora has always avoided.

The community backlash has been extensive, as you'll find in the discussion under the forum announcement: Fedora AI Developer Desktop Objective

After the recent rejection, a new draft of the proposal is in the works. They've set an escalation deadline for May 22, 2026. If the Council remains deadlocked, it will probably become a topic of debate at the Flock 2026 conference.

 
Last edited: