Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Another Avast Behavior Blocker vs Ransomware Test
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Orion" data-source="post: 705095" data-attributes="member: 51621"><p>Hi CS and others,</p><p>TI again.So [USER=43696]@Alikhan[/USER] and I have been talking about the delay in detection by BB for ransomware specifically.The principal developer of IDP from AVG said that this is due to cloud where if you disable file shield the cloud is not being queried which results in delay of detection.So some part of IDP relies on file shield and cloud to make decision in time.Also you are forgetting the usual chain my dear friend.If avast can block the source there is no way a binary will get dropped.While this is not a excuse there is a proper reason for the delay since there is cloud involvement in the decisions being made any new or old ransom malware may get a delayed detection.File shield also has cybercapture,deepscreen,filerep and evo-gen built into it so disabling it effectively cuts off avast means to fight against unknown malware.You can read Ali's post here:</p><p><a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/another-avast-behavior-blocker-vs-ransomware-test.76225/page-2#post-680437" target="_blank">Video Review - Another Avast Behavior Blocker vs Ransomware Test</a></p><p></p><p>Please keep this in mind guys before basing conclusions because each product has a different way to protect its users without knowing that there is no proper test bed to replicate real world scenario's..</p><p></p><p></p><p>Btw,i have a twitter for malware research too.Follow @avman1995</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Orion, post: 705095, member: 51621"] Hi CS and others, TI again.So [USER=43696]@Alikhan[/USER] and I have been talking about the delay in detection by BB for ransomware specifically.The principal developer of IDP from AVG said that this is due to cloud where if you disable file shield the cloud is not being queried which results in delay of detection.So some part of IDP relies on file shield and cloud to make decision in time.Also you are forgetting the usual chain my dear friend.If avast can block the source there is no way a binary will get dropped.While this is not a excuse there is a proper reason for the delay since there is cloud involvement in the decisions being made any new or old ransom malware may get a delayed detection.File shield also has cybercapture,deepscreen,filerep and evo-gen built into it so disabling it effectively cuts off avast means to fight against unknown malware.You can read Ali's post here: [URL="https://malwaretips.com/threads/another-avast-behavior-blocker-vs-ransomware-test.76225/page-2#post-680437"]Video Review - Another Avast Behavior Blocker vs Ransomware Test[/URL] Please keep this in mind guys before basing conclusions because each product has a different way to protect its users without knowing that there is no proper test bed to replicate real world scenario's.. Btw,i have a twitter for malware research too.Follow @avman1995 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top