Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 813410">This is my stance too. In all honesty this is the best advice. It&#039;s fun and all to runs tests and read them, they do provide some interesting info, no questions asked. However, as I&#039;ve always said, tests don&#039;t always represent the real world, therefore it&#039;s always important to run the program(s) for yourself and see how it works for you. It&#039;s the only way to know for sure. Just because someone has one experience with a particular program, doesn&#039;t mean it will be the same for you.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />My experiences are similar to yours. As I&#039;ve said above, it&#039;s always important to try any program for yourself and see, it&#039;s the only way to know for sure if it meets your needs and performs the way you want it to. IMO there are way too many variables to truly get an accurate rating on performance. For example of you look at AV test and MRG Effitas test results, they place WD the same, or ahead of many others compared to Av comparatives, so depending on the system/usage, there will be differences.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 813410"] This is my stance too. In all honesty this is the best advice. It's fun and all to runs tests and read them, they do provide some interesting info, no questions asked. However, as I've always said, tests don't always represent the real world, therefore it's always important to run the program(s) for yourself and see how it works for you. It's the only way to know for sure. Just because someone has one experience with a particular program, doesn't mean it will be the same for you.;) My experiences are similar to yours. As I've said above, it's always important to try any program for yourself and see, it's the only way to know for sure if it meets your needs and performs the way you want it to. IMO there are way too many variables to truly get an accurate rating on performance. For example of you look at AV test and MRG Effitas test results, they place WD the same, or ahead of many others compared to Av comparatives, so depending on the system/usage, there will be differences.;) [/QUOTE]

Verification