Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mlnevese" data-source="post: 835382" data-attributes="member: 36157">False positives is not a problem to most enthusiasts that frequent forums like this. If it happens they know how to deal with it. BUT most people are not enthusiasts. In a situation like mine a lawyer in my country who was using Kaspersky back when it blocked government sites would be unable to access any of the internal Court systems and would be unable to work with that computer. Most people don&#039;t have any idea what black list and white lists are or how to manage them.In other words a consumer level product must have as few FP as possible. It also should be as automatic as possible. If it&#039;s configurable so that a more experienced user can have a higher degree of control then it&#039;s good for both the experienced and the inexperienced user.A business protection product on the other hand is meant to be configured by a specialist and should give as much control to that professional as possible.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mlnevese, post: 835382, member: 36157"] False positives is not a problem to most enthusiasts that frequent forums like this. If it happens they know how to deal with it.[B] BUT[/B] most people are not enthusiasts. In a situation like mine a lawyer in my country who was using Kaspersky back when it blocked government sites would be unable to access any of the internal Court systems and would be unable to work with that computer. Most people don't have any idea what black list and white lists are or how to manage them. In other words a consumer level product must have as few FP as possible. It also should be as automatic as possible. If it's configurable so that a more experienced user can have a higher degree of control then it's good for both the experienced and the inexperienced user. A business protection product on the other hand is meant to be configured by a specialist and should give as much control to that professional as possible. [/QUOTE]

Verification