I find the results very strange as almost all of the AV's false positive detection has increased, Bitdefender and Kaspersky are the only ones with no change!
The three antimalware firms said they found "some unexpected flags within [Baidu and Tencent] products, marked with the names of several test labs and implying some difference in product behavior depending on the environment they were run in."
However, only Tencent has been found to be gaming the antimalware tests, according to the antimalware firms.
Same names as always, and for Panda well isn't surprise at all because long time before their performance is a 'so-so' like a literal 'Panda' chewing a bamboo in such idle time.
Its still so inconsistent where Windows OS baseline protection is so high then differ from other test organizations + encouraging to change AV which 90% could be sufficient on all around matters.
I can't say my quick test of Panda 2016 beta yielded anywhere near that kind of result (was the worst I've tested so far--OK BD free I think was worse--detecting far less than Qihoo, Avast, Comodo, Emsi). 2015 doesn't run on Win10.