Test platform: Windows 7
Home user
Corporate solutions
Home user
Corporate solutions
and AVG Free is better than AVG ISAgain, I fail to comprehend why Eset scores so badly in performance![]()
ESET refuses to pay for giving them good marksAgain, I fail to comprehend why Eset scores so badly in performance![]()
AVG IS 98%I think there is a mistake here. AVG IS better than AVG Free about Protection against 0-day malware on February ??
I know mate, as I said I think the list has some mistakes.AVG IS 98%
AVG Free 96 %
or is failure in their test machines (not updated antivirus in right time...)
or paid version really has something to offer what free version don't have
Or.. becauseIt is also important in this test that all products are simultaneously analysed in terms of the same test cases in order to ensure that all products have been identically updated. Furthermore, the products can also be updated at any time. This is important in order to also be able to sensibly and fairly integrate products with in-the-cloud queries into the test environment.
Absolutely!!ESET... overthrown by BitDefender in performance? Not believable in Windows 7 and Windows 8.
I think, but I'm not sure thoAV-Test.org Test Procedures for Protection: http://www.av-test.org/en/test-procedures/test-modules/protection/
Or.. because
AVG Internet Security has the additional Firewall settings, "depending on behaviour and their membership in the internal databased of trusted applications".
AVG Firewall Settings.
![]()
AVG Firewall in Interactive mode.
![]()
They probably counts RAM usage (ESET can get up to 90mb of RAM) , but in most cases, RAM usage doesn't mean anything.ESET... overthrown by BitDefender in performance? Not believable in Windows 7 and Windows 8.
if you want to be first one in AV-Test results, here is the requests.. LOLHere's Eugene Kaspersky's excellent article on AV-Test
http://eugene.kaspersky.com/2013/05/09/av-test-certification-devalued/