Does AV-Test only test signature-based scanning?
The sandbox is okay but not perfect, quite often samples either execute outside of it or the just don't care about the sandbox and just do their deed. Just because Comodo calls something sandboxed doesn't mean it can't do any harm. (Comodo is not the only one doing this, there are others which shall not be named or otherwise the cool aid drinkers show up again...)Does AV-Test only test signature-based scanning?
As I know, the default setting of CIS will enable the auto-sandbox.
In my opinion, the protection capability of CIS with auto-sandbox enabled is good.
Comodo's standard default setting used to be excellent years back, since users had been complaining about too many popups the company changed the default setting to reduce amount of popups and that result to slightly weaker performance.
This is to underline how crappy and weak the security actually is, if Comodo on basic settings cannot match that of others then how much less protection would they give on max settings? In all seriousness Comodo's only plus point at this point is their Firewall which is rather good YET due its NON smart configuration it provides a placebo security effect because even techy guys get lost in the ocean of features.The score of Comodo...why?
Yes always a strong contender and always a solid performer and imo a top 5 brand by all standards.The score of Norton Security 2015.
Guess what? the settings of every package is horrible and Comodo is no exception yet the difference between lets say Norton and Comodo is that the settings within Norton DO WORK... something that cannot be said about Comodo...