Thanks for sharing
Yes a decent test, but honestly I don't like when the reviewer uses to rename the samples: malware (1)...malware (2)...etc.
Something to hide ?.....
Thanks for sharing
Yes a decent test, but honestly I don't like when the reviewer uses to rename the samples: malware (1)...malware (2)...etc.
Something to hide ?.....
The testers get their samples with SHA256: a7693198ebe5cec461b5acda26185795f149514afb5cb5972eb2ac07a4ade4aa.bin
It seems to me they always adding the file extension .EXE (malware[1].exe) to every file without proving the file type of the samples.
If you don't get the original file type sometimes the sample is not able to run (Exactly that happened in the video)