Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
AVG Free Antivirus 2018 vs ESET Nod32 Antivirus 2019 (Battle Test) Warball Communauty
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcos" data-source="post: 789132" data-attributes="member: 9023"><p>ESET has not used signature-based approach since NOD32 v1 which already leveraged heuristics to detect new malware not covered by signatures. Currently there are plenty of HIPS-based modules that are able to detect new malware based on its suspicious behavior. In particular it's advanced heuristics coupled with smart DNA detections, Advanced memory scanner to detect new malware upon execution, Exploit blocker to detect new exploits based on unusual behavior, ransomware shield detecting ransomware-like behavior, etc. All these leverage HIPS so HIPS is not a useless module at all. For a complete list of technologies that ESET has developed to combat new malware, please read more at <a href="https://www.eset.com/int/about/technology/" target="_blank">ESET Technology</a>. Moreover, in v12.1 beta a HIPS-based Behavior monitor was enabled to loudly report malware based on suspicious behavior patterns with Augur, the machine learning module, to follow soon.</p><p></p><p>What I was objecting above was grey / clean samples that were included in the test set that were not subject to detection and for which ESET was penalized for not detecting them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcos, post: 789132, member: 9023"] ESET has not used signature-based approach since NOD32 v1 which already leveraged heuristics to detect new malware not covered by signatures. Currently there are plenty of HIPS-based modules that are able to detect new malware based on its suspicious behavior. In particular it's advanced heuristics coupled with smart DNA detections, Advanced memory scanner to detect new malware upon execution, Exploit blocker to detect new exploits based on unusual behavior, ransomware shield detecting ransomware-like behavior, etc. All these leverage HIPS so HIPS is not a useless module at all. For a complete list of technologies that ESET has developed to combat new malware, please read more at [URL='https://www.eset.com/int/about/technology/']ESET Technology[/URL]. Moreover, in v12.1 beta a HIPS-based Behavior monitor was enabled to loudly report malware based on suspicious behavior patterns with Augur, the machine learning module, to follow soon. What I was objecting above was grey / clean samples that were included in the test set that were not subject to detection and for which ESET was penalized for not detecting them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top