Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
AVG Free Antivirus 2018 vs ESET Nod32 Antivirus 2019 (Battle Test) Warball Communauty
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mahesh Sudula" data-source="post: 789138" data-attributes="member: 65679"><p>Great to see you here!</p><p>I have been an AV tester for the past 6-7 yrs and learnt a lot along with MT forum here:</p><p>Eset user up to 2016 June.</p><p>Eset is highly tenable to any malware that by pass it's signatures. Its removal capability is none against unknown malware so it's blocking ability.</p><p>HIPS - Allow all/ Block All.</p><p>Moreover I have seen Eset failing desperately in my tests..it sucks so much that I stopped testing it!</p><p>Eset - Signature based AV like Avira with non existent BB, Heuristics, Signature dependent modules including Anti Ransom.</p><p>Why don't you guys working upon pro active part. Deceiving the customers based upon tests, Graphs is an another thing a part from developing the product from it's flaws and accepting it.</p><p>I am looking forward to test your product if you guys work on improving the product.</p><p>Forgive me if I'm a bit harsh. </p><p>Just luk at the Eset tests in hub and YouTube. It does not qualify even for basic malware protection tests a part from great signatures. At least take these suggestions, looKing forward for a more developed product.</p><p>Best Regards.</p><p>Mahesh Sudula.</p><p>G data Beta Tester (Senior) @ G data labs.</p><p>You can confirm my identity from G data guys or Their security labs speaker - Ralf Benzmuler.</p><p>The above points are said based upon my detailed tests over these years with these security suites.</p><p>I heard or read some where that Eset is working on a behaviour module</p><p>Any info on it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mahesh Sudula, post: 789138, member: 65679"] Great to see you here! I have been an AV tester for the past 6-7 yrs and learnt a lot along with MT forum here: Eset user up to 2016 June. Eset is highly tenable to any malware that by pass it's signatures. Its removal capability is none against unknown malware so it's blocking ability. HIPS - Allow all/ Block All. Moreover I have seen Eset failing desperately in my tests..it sucks so much that I stopped testing it! Eset - Signature based AV like Avira with non existent BB, Heuristics, Signature dependent modules including Anti Ransom. Why don't you guys working upon pro active part. Deceiving the customers based upon tests, Graphs is an another thing a part from developing the product from it's flaws and accepting it. I am looking forward to test your product if you guys work on improving the product. Forgive me if I'm a bit harsh. Just luk at the Eset tests in hub and YouTube. It does not qualify even for basic malware protection tests a part from great signatures. At least take these suggestions, looKing forward for a more developed product. Best Regards. Mahesh Sudula. G data Beta Tester (Senior) @ G data labs. You can confirm my identity from G data guys or Their security labs speaker - Ralf Benzmuler. The above points are said based upon my detailed tests over these years with these security suites. I heard or read some where that Eset is working on a behaviour module Any info on it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top