- Jul 2, 2014
- 1,717
With respect to the Best Free Antivirus 2015 competition, I'm starting a thread series where users of the various products will be joining together to state the Pro's and Con's of each antivirus/internet security software and why they think it is a contender or not for the Best Free Antivirus.
The first post will be updated by me with what user's think is good and bad about the product, so an informed decision can be made for newcomers.
Related Threads:
Avast Free Antivirus - The Pro's and Con's
Qihoo 360 Total Security - The Pro's and Con's
Comodo Internet Security Premium - The Pro's and Con's
Panda Free Antivirus - The Pro's and Con's
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE PRO'S
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE CON'S
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first post will be updated by me with what user's think is good and bad about the product, so an informed decision can be made for newcomers.
Related Threads:
Avast Free Antivirus - The Pro's and Con's
Qihoo 360 Total Security - The Pro's and Con's
Comodo Internet Security Premium - The Pro's and Con's
Panda Free Antivirus - The Pro's and Con's
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE PRO'S
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Very light
- Smooth running
- Nice UI
- Great offline engine
- Great cloud engine
- Excellent detection for non-zero day threats
- High quality signatures with frequent updates
- Less false positives
- Deep file scan
- APC helps to improve the overall transmission of samples
- Add-on for Chrome and Opera
THE CON'S
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Pop'up's (not confirmed)
- Pointless browser launcher using too much memory
- Poor zero-day protection/behavioral shield
- Weak heuristic protection
- No firewall or web shields
- No sandboxing technology
- Removal tends to be painful for each detections due to repeated scanning
- Real-time file detection causes Luke Filewalker to scan operations taking time and CPU
- Safe file Exceptions need to be added to real-time and on-demand categories
Last edited: